Portal de Murcia
www.portaldemurcia.com
Esther note Herguedas Councilman IU + Greens in the city of Murcia:
Seems to have been installed as custom rebutting the arguments with data and documents for this councilor with value judgments that attempt to disqualify, relying on the ignorance of "rookie" of the undersigned.
So did the city a few days ago López Rejas valuing some statements that certainly proved my ignorance and this is the tone that seems to also derives from the response I received to my criticism by irregularities and excessive cost of the new office Aliens by the Town Planning Councillor and Deputy Government.
The brevity and conciseness that requires a press release as issued by me on April 2, does not normally allow spread of the data, but about allegations of forgery should make them clear.
If the distance from Murcia to the new office is or is not 14 km is considered in the response of the Government Delegate as a nonsense that overshadows the rest of my complaints, mainly from the excessive payment made by the property that apparently does not want to comment: € 8.1 million, more than double the market value without knowing if it was a competition of acquisition.
In my press conference I referred to this location for information more than anything else, and I said exactly the polygon, depending on the area was between about 10-12 km from Murcia (you can listen to the recording on the website IURM http://www.iu-regiondemurcia.es/noticia.asp?id=3011&idp=3&t=1 , minute 1:14. In any event, despite being an anecdotal matter, I stand by that statement unless The road map I have consulted are poorly made, but measurements may vary once you make the new roundabout tendered by the central government is going to cost us 1.7 million to be built by the poor accessibility in the area.
He answers the Town Planning saying that know what I mean when I refer to urban planning procedures.
That Mr. Berberena make these claims are not new, because the same thing I said in the town meetings when they do not know what to say. It's certainly not my intention to compare Mr. Berberena in their deep knowledge and proven in urban issues but certainly in this case it happens that I've looked at the record and in front of his assertion that existed from 2004, dated February 17, 2009, the works in this office still had no license, despite being almost completed.
And it can hardly be a license to the foreign office since 2004 when the building was purchased in December 2007. These are the details: the building license file the foreign office is the 3865/2008 LE.
That is, this is a record 2008 that is processed after the request of Jesus Camacho Mengual representing the Building and Industrial Rentals, dated April 4, 2008 for further work: restoration or upgrading of existing buildings in accordance with the draft submitted endorsed by the College of Architects on 31/03/1908.
The license granted in 2004 referred to Mr. Berberena, is not this project, but that of an industrial building that was partially built on that plot (expte. 9363/03).
The new project requires new license, and therefore opens a file in which a succession of reports, in the time when the file in February, are dated from May 2008 through January 2009 without consist as a file kept in the same license document.
In the question I will address the plenary session on this and other issues such as failure of the draft planning regulations in regard to parking.
Will certainly be a good opportunity for Mr. Councillor for Town Planning review the records and reports contained in it and explain why these do not capture the need for plans to build the roundabout for access to the office and it's going to cost more of 300,000 €.
Source: IU+LV, Ayuntamiento de Murcia
Privacy policy
- Legal notice
- Cookies