Portal de Murcia
www.portaldemurcia.com
Note from IU + LV:
In recent days we have seen published op-ed a successful and complete information that we have been reminded of all that entailed and has led the New Condomina agreement and we have to add an important fact that we have not been reflected, the only force policy that does not voted for the Convention was IU.
It's time has finally come confirming and giving the reason in each of the objections that we discussed then.
In this case we must distinguish two aspects: the sporty and urban development that are confused because they are closely related and have the same origin: the business group Samper-Trujillo after squeezing the maximum Condomina business areas, leaving the city that they he and expose those who supported them both and now trying to divert attention from his responsibility and therefore regret, feel deceived and disappointed, as the victims and made appeals to the public and the motion presented at the last plenum IU + LV did not vote because as we are not causing it, now we have no reason to participate in the comedy ..
In sporting terms the concern comes when you know the financial status of RM and its owners announced that they will resort to bankruptcy.
For us we do not particularly think the procedure is to put their hands to the head.
The recent reform of the Insolvency Act has made this provides a useful tool which aims to ensure that run the debt payments.
Further, the Act establishes a series of guarantees that may even have consequences for those responsible for the company if it has not acted diligently.
This aspect may be particularly interesting to clarify what kind of accounts are maintained in the Real Murcia in the light of the data being filtered (cost of 25 million euros in electronic form, a debt is not known if 50 million or 30 and this year that if that if three of four).
The reason for this mess and this lack of clarification should be sought in the framework of Samper companies in which buy-sell-manages itself (charges Samper Samper Developments Real Murcia).
Who should pay this debt?.
IU + LV is clear: the need to pay the club's owners and New Condomina Developments is the company that has 98% of the shares of Real Murcia.
We will not consent to be citizens of Murcia to pay the debt over Samper-Trujillo, and we hope that both the Mayor and the Councillor for Sports stop speaking so lightly of this matter is of public money.
The sporting theme is the excuse that to achieve the objectives in the urban area.
Samper and Trujillo intended to leave without fulfilling what they have left the convention and especially not comply with the Supreme Court ruling requiring them to give the municipality of Murcia on almost 58,000 m2 of 10% profitable use which they agreed to exclude the Convention.
This land has been valued by the municipal officers at 18 million euros (press a few months ago talked of a market value of 30 million), and this would be the money they have to return to the municipal coffers.
And to reinforce the pressure situation, assisted by Juan Enrique Serrano, a prominent lawyer who was planning councilor PSOE you to change the agreement and settle all obligations stipulated for the parties claiming the stadium, valued at 27.14 million of has cost 25 million euros more.
A New Developments Condomina amount if it has been spent (and views bearing accounts, which we doubt), it has since been given the win and not because it was bound by the agreement.
With these actions, Samper and Trujillo create a scenario to your needs and try to place the City in the same situation in 99 forcing them to give up their claims.
And it's not fool ourselves: when negotiating something must be put on the table.
And what they have to negotiate the Mayor and Cascales?
On the one hand the 58,000 m2 or the amount in cash.
On the other municipal stadium yet we know that it is, because two years has been exploited to develop new Condomina without conveying the property to the council (as the agreement required it) and possibly unlicensed activity, because this matter and others about the ownership of the stadium has not been cleared yet by the government team to the Councillor in October presented a complete question in full.
When asked the other day in an interview the mayor replied evasively about the status of processing the application.
The remaining unfulfilled aspects of the agreement such as the municipal golf course, whose virtues he sang last year Councillor Moya Angeles-while announcing that he would be finished in late 2008.
It is seen that after passing him by, the work was stopped
Before this case, the UI + LV position is clear.
Here there is nothing to negotiate and much to demand.
We refuse to continue giving money to Samper-Trujillo and blackmail to which they want to submit.
We do not forgive any debt or accept a compromise.
We demand the implementation of outstanding aspects of the Convention and the execution of the sentence which undertakes to deliver the 58.000m2 or the amount in cash.
Do not give up full ownership of the Estadio Municipal.
Moreover, at the time that signing the agreement disappears scene and Real Murcia, we understand that the transfer of exclusive use to the club for 50 years should be rescinded.
And openly and clear explanations that the mayor and Cascales stop distracting maneuvers and explain clearly what they are negotiating.
Source: IU+LV, Ayuntamiento de Murcia
Privacy policy
- Legal notice
- Cookies