Implicitly recognized a responsibility to the euphemistically called "commitment to collaboration" New Capital Company 200 SL executing the works of the parking lot of La Vega consisting of the income of 600,000 € for the municipality by the closure "precautionary" of that facility while the construction work the parking lot.
This commitment, agreed at the last Board of Governors of May 21 was discussed out of agenda and of course advertising is omitted in the subsequent press conference, just as it ignored the demolition agreement a week later , an attitude that puts us on alert because of the lack of transparency surrounding this issue.
The ease with which the Councillor for Sports accepts the money hits the absence of factual information.
IU + VL Since we wonder if this closure "precautionary" was necessary for the completion of the parking Why was not reflected in the draft submitted by the company and won the competition for its implementation?
Is it that whenever you run a car you have to close the surrounding buildings?
Do the City and the company forecast same close to the houses of the Avenida de la Libertad where the same company will dig 5 floors underground in a narrow space surrounded by large buildings?
And if we suppose, the closure and destruction of this facility is the result of defects in the construction of parking why the City does not give explanations on this issue?
Perhaps because the recognition of corporate responsibility in the Cagigal is also recognition of the flaws that have appeared in the surrounding buildings?
And if the company is responsible for you going to settle the City Council with the amount of 600,000 € to not cover the costs of demolition and subsequent construction of a new pavilion by the Murcia pay the fudge?
Too many questions and too little clarity with which the United Left Group + The greens are going to ask for explanations for the Mayor at the next plenary session.
Source: IU+LV Murcia