Portal de Murcia

www.portaldemurcia.com

• Home
• Business
• Hotels
• Restaurants
• News
• Advertisement

Murcia now so urgent requests to the City Council review of the General Plan and begin to submit applications for automatic review of all partial and urban development plans adopted since 2001

The Supreme Court of the Region of Murcia has canceled one of two partial plans (the ZM-PT1?) With which the PP wanted to build a residential Bacons Bridge and prolong the Levante Park.

Now Councillor Murcia Angeles Micol made technical reports lawsuit against the project, and the municipal training ensures that asked "political and legal responsibilities of those responsible", while urging a review and amendment of the General Plan and Announces which will begin next week to submit requests for automatic review of all partial and urban development plans adopted since 2001.

The Bacons Bridge development project has been canceled due to not request the mandatory report of water resources at the CHS.

Although there were many more allegations against the partial plan, the Supreme Court has stopped studying as has proven the absence of the report of the body of basin.

Micol partial plan explains that the ZM-PT1 consists of 600 thousand square meters, "which twice has Joven Futura", and provided for the construction of nearly 5,000 homes.

Councillor recalled that the first allegations arose in 2004, and that "until 2009 came presenting resources, which already warned of the lack of water resources. In 2009, finally, proceedings were initiated."

The mayor recalled that for the macro project of Parque de Levante, affected by the partial plan now canceled, the City hired an alleged architect of the MoMA, which has been a significant outlay of money, on account of all Murcia: "They He was one of the flagships of the planning of the PP, and has also gone down. The economic and urban fabric of the PP in the region and the city is uncovering step by step. They will still leave more cases of canceled projects " .

Micol explains that this new case shows that "the economic and urban PP model is based on interests and speculation, rather than in the general interest, heritage and ground, his back to a model of town sustainable and fair. "

Now Murcia notes that "once again it becomes clear that urgent amendment of the General Plan, to revise all plans and ongoing projects and lay the foundations for sustainable urban development and a model of inclusive and fair city".

The municipal formation will continue asking for the review and amendment of the General Plan, and will require "political and legal responsibilities of those responsible for this new shameful episode of the PP."

The Civic Platform is satisfied by the many neighbors who are finally free from the threat of expropriation of their homes, and now relied on Councillor Micol Angeles to defend their rights.

Source: Ahora Murcia