Portal de Murcia
www.portaldemurcia.com
Regarding the controversial call the City of Murcia on a job board bbca assistant.
Mpal of Red.
of Bbcas., we want to make public many of the claims that have been communicated in writing and verbally to the City and that to date, remain unanswered.
The "commission of inquiry" has generated much news release relating to leaks, we want to make public other irregularities, the nature of which invalidates the test.
The absurdity in the forms
Publication of the rules of the competition and generating written complaints, such as the Association of Professional Index Murcia.
Five days after published in the BORM removing references that allowed developing an agenda (supposedly is the complaint of an academy to include a publication of the competition).
The decision is made without consulting all stakeholders, so that the SIME has brought an contencioso.administrativo.
The deadline for applications overflows records, as it requires the presentation of the merits claimed.
A list of accepted and rejected claims that collects numerous published.
Subsequently replaced on the City Council website for an "updated list" with some defects so as not expressly state the reason for the exclusion is only collected 1, 3, ....
.
The tlfs.
HR does not stop ringing, the "unsupported", tell them to remedy the defects and bring documentation to the test.
The final list of admitted and excluded is never published, causing many would not submit to the test, or do so with the uncertainty of whether they will be admitted.
Some "not admitted" fail the test and are included with admission to the list of "qualifications".
Etc ....
Other "incidents"
Some candidates were allowed to continue writing off the time set.
Address indicated CDU practice pencil test, while others pen ..
The folios to make and deliver the test were not sealed or contained distinction.
In some classroom instruction indicate name and ID in the worksheet that contains the results of the practical test was given.
The next day, a member of the tribunal said in relation to the identification of the practical test "have been cut personal data we could" and "Do not worry it's all saved"
The result of the practical test at the bedside or stapling escrow unseparated test was collected.
Some were conducive to the test in the back of the sheet containing the UDC notations, unmarked and highlight the front (which implies greater difficulty and less time to solve) erroneous instructions.
In some cases not able to attend public act or existence of separation of tenders mentioned.
Etc ...
At this point and, knowing that in court, the HR Department of the City of Murcia and the Councillor know all these incidents. They have received numerous telephone complaints;
and some political parties and unions have written complaints addressed to Councillor Human Resources and Security, transmitting the discomfort of many opponents.
All this occurred before the publication of test scores, and therefore without controversy relaferida contemplate possible leaks.
That is why on news releases and statements from the "commission of inquiry" aimed at "alleged leaks", we conclude that before the publication of scores, HR should have reported the re-test, and he knew that they violated fundamental rights such as the constitutional principles of equality and advertising in the Access to Public Service, etc ... Also the anonymity premise is the guarantor of fairness in the correction, etc ... was not respected So we hope that the City rectify and invalidating all the evidence and convene a new one that guarantees fundamental rights of those who introduced ourselves.
Otherwise do not rule the courts and we invite those who wish to affected contact platform affected by the by: afectadosporoposiciondemurcia@gmail.com
Source: Afectados por oposición de Murcia
Privacy policy
- Legal notice
- Cookies