The municipal group of IU-Greens in the city of Murcia requested person to the criminal case because of the 'Umbra', investigating a plot of urban corruption that figure as accused the mayor of the city, Miguel Ángel Cámara.
The spokesperson training session Murcia, Esther Herguedas, and the coordinator of this training in the town, Francisco Muñoz, presented this morning the resource customization in court instructing the cause, accompanied by counsel Joaquín Dólera.
Herguedas has indicated that this personación the case, "provide an ethical referent" as IU-Green "is the only political party that can claim to have never voted for any of the issues as part of the investigation."
"It's not only that we were the only vote against the agreement New Condomina, but also in the Full Council warned the rest of the Corporation grave illegality was being committed," added the mayor.
He noted that his training has "moral force" to be present in the process and can provide a "positive value" as "political force that has always defended the legality and sustainable, rational and serving the citizens planning, not speculators. "
Meanwhile, the lawyer Joaquín Dólera personación indicated that IU-Greens in the case aims to collaborate with the administration of justice and contribute to the policy to be "transparent" and eradicate "once and for all" the corruption.
Dólera explained that the course of action on this resource has three parts, the first of which cooperate with an investigation "that is honestly making by the judge, the prosecutor and the rest of personadas allegations" in the process.
"Apparently, there is a legal guideline PP statewide. As went well what Judge Elpidio Silva, as an investigation of these features try to kill the messenger, who is the one who tries to discover the truth," he noted counsel.
The second part, Dólera continued, is that "we want to avoid procedural traps, nullity actions that often arise in the defense of the accused and preventing finally get to the truth."
In this regard, it has been argued that IU-Greens want identify responsibilities appropriate to that "whoever did pay it and return to the public purse that belongs to all citizens of the municipality."
Third, the lawyer noted that propose, once you have the documentation and testing new measures that "will be aimed at clarifying the facts and determine who is responsible in this case."
Source: IURM