Portal de Murcia

www.portaldemurcia.com

• Home
• Business
• Hotels
• Restaurants
• News
• Advertisement

The IU-Greens spokesman in the city of Murcia, Esther Herguedas, considered today that the Mayor and the Councillor of Finance "make a misuses of data in order to escape reality, which is that citizens will pay the consequences of crisis through the general increase of taxes, fees and public. "

Herguedas noted that "the lowering effect on the overall number of taxes per capita that preaches the PP is not due to a reduction of these, but the decline in economic activity mainly derived from the fall of the building."

To compensate, "the government team has decided to increase the pressure on those taxes and fees that have a direct impact on citizens using three-way."

The first is the general increase of all taxes, fees and public citizens who pay, beginning with the IBI, (+ 7.34 percent), refuse collection (1.85 percent), sports services ( in some cases 30 percent) and primary schools that will raise their public prices for next year by 66 percent.

Another way used as Herguedas assures, will be the collection of services that were once free.

In his view, "brings shame to think that the Popular Party raised more than one million euros between recipients of welfare services as home care, respite care or telecare".

The same can be said of the new service charge for employment promotion, which targets unemployed, or who thinks raise 267,000 euros for the use of municipal facilities in the area of ​​culture, "something of a serious harm to the associations cultural, whose activity, beneficial Township, thanks asfixiándolas with cuts in subsidies and the introduction of these new prices. "

"The third way is oriented toward greater criminalization and persecution harassment through punitive way: increase revenue forecasts for traffic fines and more than 20% of those sanctions as a result of the crisis can not do time against their tax obligations. "

To Herguedas, analysis of the section on Income "reveals the face of this budget more antisocial because they pay more for those who have less, rather introduce elements that lead to further escalation."

Source: IURM