Guillén Martínez Mariola The mayor claims that the PP municipal paid 3.3 million euros to the Joint Venture Company for work that appeared as voluntary improvements in the supply of the company and were not included in the project when this happened the UTE withdrew the appeal against the City of Murcia
The PSOE Councillor Mariola Martinez Guillen says, after studying the administrative proceedings regarding the award of the section 0 of the tram to the JV Ortiz and Acciona, there are many shadows on the way it has handled and settled in this project.
The Big Lie
First, Guillén Martínez complaint, that the 30-month demonstration of the tramway in Murcia were not free and once said the municipal PP, but eventually it will cost to Murcia over 30 million euros, we will pay to Tram society Murcia SA, awarded the management and operation of the section 1 is currently under construction.
3.3 million euros
Likewise, the socialist mayor refers to EUR 3.3 million paid to the PP JV Ortiz and Acciona in exchange for withdrawing the administrative appeal against the City, thus paying voluntary improvements like project works .
Works that have not been made and paid
Similarly, the PSOE Councillor says it has been established that no significant construction works worth 4 million euros through contained in the draft approved by the municipal government, such as failure to complete a diversion rather than the three expected, earthworks and concrete works in the tram platform valued at over EUR 2 million and the implementation of some security and communications systems under the project, among others.
Regarding this last point, Martinez Guillen questioned who will pay for these works now necessary for the operation of the tramway and, according to the project approved by the Town Hall, must have done and has not made the JV Ortiz and Acciona .
Finally, the socialist mayor finds it incomprehensible that all these anomalies is returned to the said Joint Venture Company of the posted bond at the time of 800,000 euros, which should have responded to any breach of contract, as evidenced what happened to examples such as the cost of subsidence that have occurred in Juan Carlos I, or expense suffered by the town for months to replace the tram for free buses to the coast due to the inability at that time that could circular due to subsidence of the floor above.
Source: PSOE Murcia