Portal de Murcia

www.portaldemurcia.com

• Home
• Business
• Hotels
• Restaurants
• News
• Advertisement

- The mayor also criticizes another planning file that has led the PP to the Commission, "a modification of the PGOU in Cabezo de Torres with 11 repairs of the Ministry of Development of which only one has been remedied"

NOW MURCIA asks to investigate "the strange case" of the construction of the Hotel AC, in the Juan Carlos I Avenue, as today has been taken to the Committee of Urban Planning the approval of a file that had to be approved to allow said construction, "In spite of which it has been built and functioning for years".

Councilor Angeles Micol explains that the file that has taken the PP to the Committee of Urbanism is the consolidated text of a detailed study of said hotel, "which has already been granted and is already built."

Micol recalled that the aforementioned text "is a preliminary step to the construction of a building, so it is now necessary to see how a building was licensed without having approved the revised text of the detail study."

Now Murcia has requested a copy of the license granted by the City Council to the hotel, and has asked to investigate what happened.

"Urban planning in the City of Murcia once again proves that it is being done without any criteria," says Micol, "as it shows that the Urban Planning Commission today have taken three planning dossiers and have been left on the table without To process two of them coming from the year 2005, of the time of the urbanistic and real estate bubble, in which were Berberena of councilman and Camera of alcalde ".

The mayor of Now Murcia shows his astonishment that "after so many years, the municipal government of the PP draw urban planning records from that time, many of which, if not all, manifest irregularities of such a draft that cause that Do not go forward. "

The second planning dossier that the PP has not been able to approve today in the Urban Planning Commission has been a modification of the PGOU in Cabezo de Torres, "to which the Ministry of Development put a year ago 11 repairs, of which only Corrected one, as recognized by the Head of Planning Service of the City Council.

The mayor says that this modification "seeks not to execute an expropriation envisaged in the PGOU, increasing the buildability of landowners and paying for processing, in addition, with public money."

Micol underscores that "in the municipality there are hundreds of cases identical to this one, of lands that according to the PGOU must be expropriated and that they have not been. What does not make sense is that for not executing these expropriations it is granted greater buildability to the owners , And that the above costs are borne by the City Council.This amendment has no justification, "it implies," if something foreseen in the PGOU is not going to be executed, nothing happens, it is not executed and it is already, and when the PGOU, these actions will be annulled.The PP has, in short, sought to bring to the Plenary a modification without remedying and without justification, when the Land Law requires that the modifications are very justified.

Source: Ahora Murcia