Portal de Murcia

www.portaldemurcia.com

• Home
• Business
• Hotels
• Restaurants
• News
• Advertisement

The councilwoman also claims that Urbamusa "look done with the management and administration of public housing, trying to remove the Town Hall functions well to survive"

NOW MURCIA has voted against the formulation of accounts Urbamusa presented today to the shareholders of the company, which are the city of Murcia and the autonomous region, and has reserved the appropriate action it deems necessary, as estimated with an asset of more than 10 million euros "is not serious facilitate documentation to opposition groups two days before and biased, making it impossible for our work."

Councilwoman Angeles Micol, present in the Board and the Board of Directors believes that the company Urbamusa "should be dissolved and liquidated, as we believe that it is an opaque society and that can be an instrument for awarding contracts so alien to public control. "

Now Murcia has also voted against the budget for 2016, since, says the mayor, "have provided only a sheet on one side with data on the budget".

To Micol, "Urbamusa doubles the work they should do officials of the Department of Planning, keeping 27 employees who have been handpicked without complying with the principles of merit, equality and capacity as well as its financing and mandates of work is opaque ".

Councilwoman Now Murcia also notes that "Urbamusa calls for support to deal with the management and administration of public housing, a function currently performed by the departments of Planning and Education, University Relations and Heritage, bearing the Housing service. therefore, again we find that Urbamusa functions the City tries to take for her to survive. "

The mayor also claims that the works regarding coastal, Urbamusa manager has indicated that there is no criterion by which the North Coast is almost finished and the South practically does not exist.

"It has also stated that there are no plans to make new sections in the South Coast," said Micol.

"This means a serious discrimination between the inhabitants of the North and South zones".

Councilwoman denounces the serious imbalances in the investments made in recent years in the Coastal North and South, which can not be justified in the population they serve and yes, however, in urban and private interests of the North.

Thus, Micol explains that in the past two years, 71% of the budget for coastal has been assigned to which services the northern zone, with investment in these two years of 261'46 euros per head of population in that area, but 29% of spending on the South Coast has only an investment of 77'75 euros per inhabitant of the towns of that area.

This happens while 59% of the neighbors who will serve coastal living in the districts of the South, which acrecenta this imbalance.

Source: Ahora Murcia